passé récent + imparfait

The construction venir de + infinitive expresses an action that has just happened. When venir is in the imperfect, the speaker places this recent action in a past narrative frame, often to set background context or to describe what was true at a specific moment in the past.

Grammatical structure:

  • Imperfect of venir + de + infinitive
  • The infinitive describes the completed action
  • The reference point is in the past, not the present

Core meaning

Je venais d’acheter means “I had just bought.” The focus is on the immediate anteriority of the action relative to another past moment.

Examples:

  • Je venais d’acheter la voiture quand il a appelé. I had just bought the car when he called.
  • Elle venait de fermer la porte. She had just closed the door.
  • Nous venions de commencer le repas. We had just started the meal.
  • Ils venaient d’arriver. They had just arrived.

Contrast with present-time passé récent

With the present tense of venir, the reference point is now. With the imperfect, the reference point is a moment in the past.

Examples:

  • Je viens d’acheter un téléphone. I have just bought a phone.
  • Je venais d’acheter un téléphone. I had just bought a phone.

This distinction is purely temporal and depends on the narrative frame.


Use in storytelling and narration

The imperfect passé récent is common in narratives, reports, and anecdotes. It often introduces a background situation interrupted by another event, frequently in the passé composé.

Examples:

  • Je venais de m’asseoir quand le téléphone a sonné. I had just sat down when the phone rang.
  • Elle venait de sortir quand il a plu. She had just gone out when it started raining.
  • Nous venions de finir quand ils sont arrivés. We had just finished when they arrived.
  • Il venait de se lever quand l’accident s’est produit. He had just gotten up when the accident happened.

Difference from the pluperfect

English often uses the pluperfect for the same meaning. French has a pluperfect, but venir de with the imperfect is often preferred for immediacy.

Examples:

  • Je venais de lire le message. I had just read the message.
  • J’avais lu le message. I had read the message.

The first stresses recency at that past moment. The second only states prior completion.


Range of time implied

The time implied by venir de is short and context dependent. It can range from seconds to minutes or slightly longer, depending on plausibility.

Examples:

  • Elle venait de partir depuis deux minutes. She had left just two minutes earlier.
  • Je venais d’apprendre la nouvelle. I had just learned the news.

Negative form

The negative places emphasis on the fact that the action had not just occurred.

Examples:

  • Je ne venais pas de comprendre. I had not just understood.
  • Ils ne venaient pas de finir. They had not just finished.

Subject and tense variation

The construction works with all persons and follows normal imperfect conjugation of venir.

Examples:

  • Tu venais de te tromper. You had just made a mistake.
  • Il venait de perdre son emploi. He had just lost his job.
  • Nous venions de décider. We had just decided.
  • Vous veniez de rentrer. You had just come back.

Alternatives and near equivalents

French has several ways to express close temporal proximity in the past, though none are exact substitutes in all contexts.

Pluperfect with temporal adverbs

  • J’avais acheté la voiture juste avant. I had bought the car just before.

Adverbs of recency

  • Je l’avais acheté récemment. I had bought it recently.

Lexical reformulation

  • À peine avais-je acheté la voiture qu’il a appelé. I had barely bought the car when he called.

These alternatives change register or focus and are less neutral than venir de.


Summary

  • Venir de + infinitive expresses immediate anteriority.
  • With the imperfect, it locates a “just happened” action at a point in the past.
  • It is frequent in narration and background description.
  • English usually translates it with “had just.”
  • It differs from the pluperfect by stressing recency rather than mere precedence.

Don’t miss new articles!

Get 1 email a week with new articles about French

We don’t spam! Read more in our privacy policy

Similar Posts

  • parer

    The French verb “parer” means “to ward off,” “to parry,” or “to fend off.” It can also mean “to protect,” “to attribute” or “to adorn.” So many meanings for one verb!

  • servir & se servir de

    In French, the verb “servir” is widely used and versatile. It can mean “to serve,” but its meaning varies depending on the context. When used reflexively as “se servir de,” it takes on a different meaning, more akin to “to use.” 1. “Servir” – Meaning and Usage The verb “servir” generally means “to serve” in…

  • chacun son truc

    Understanding “Chacun son truc” “Chacun son truc” is a common French expression that translates to “to each their own” or “everyone has their thing.” It conveys the idea that everyone has their own preferences, tastes, or ways of doing things. This phrase is often used to express tolerance or acceptance of different behaviors or choices….

  • tromper & se tromper

    The French verb tromper and its reflexive counterpart se tromper have distinct meanings and uses. While tromper generally means “to deceive” or “to cheat,” the reflexive form se tromper means “to make a mistake.” Meaning and Usage of “Tromper” 1. “Tromper” as “To Deceive” The most common meaning of tromper is “to deceive” or “to…

  • pourquoi vs c’est pour ça

    Pourquoi and pour ça both translate to “why,” but serve distinct grammatical functions. Pourquoi asks questions about reasons, while c’est pour ça provides explanations or emphasizes consequences. Pourquoi: the interrogative adverb Pourquoi means “why” and introduces questions seeking reasons or causes. It can appear in direct questions, indirect questions, and occasionally as a noun. Direct…